Repair wardrobe, setting and light on frames that are almost right. One change per job, 21 credits, originals preserved.
Per-job credit pricing is shown before you confirm. An edit produces a new piece; your original stays untouched in your account.
Every album holds frames that are nearly right. The pose is true. The light is honest. The dress, however, belongs to a different collection. The editor exists for exactly those frames. State the change in plain words — wardrobe, setting, hour of light, a single detail — and the frame is re-rendered with that one change made and everything else left standing. Editing costs 21 credits a job, shown before you confirm, and the original is never touched: it rests in your account beside its repaired version, like the bed before and after a careful pruning.
The discipline that makes editing cheap is the same discipline that makes pruning safe: one cut, then look. A gardener who reshapes the whole shrub in a single pass cannot tell which cut did the damage when the plant sulks. An editor who stacks a new dress, a new room and a new pose into one instruction has not edited a frame at all — they have commissioned a new photograph at an editor’s price and lost the original composition in the bargain. Worked singly, changes stay reversible, comparable and priced; worked in piles, they drift.
Strong bones, wrong details. A frame whose composition has failed outright costs more to repair than to regrow, and the editor is not where pride should be spent.
A single instruction keeps the rest of the frame still and the cost predictable. Three changes at once is a regeneration wearing an editing price.
Original and repair rest side by side in your account. Ship the winner. The other costs nothing further and asks nothing of you.
The same pose dressed for three different collections. The quickest multiplication a catalogue knows.
Bedroom to hotel suite to bare studio wall, without moving the woman or the light that holds her.
Morning to evening, flat to dramatic — a frame re-graded so it sits quietly among the set it is joining.
“Change the ivory robe to deep emerald silk. Keep the pose, the hair and the morning light exactly as they are.”
The change is named, and everything else is explicitly protected. The words “keep exactly” are cheap insurance, and they work every time they are used.
“Move the scene to a marble hotel bathroom in warm mirror light. The subject and her pose do not change.”
One environment, moved once. A new room, a new dress and a new pose inside a single job is a new photograph, and should be briefed and budgeted as one.
| Situation | The better move |
|---|---|
| Pose and light are right; details are wrong | Edit — it keeps the bones and costs less |
| The composition itself has missed | Regrow the frame with a corrected brief |
| One keeper, three collections | Edit three times from the one keeper |
21 credits per job, shown before you confirm. Repairing a keeper is normally cheaper than regrowing and re-judging an entire set.
No. The repair is a new frame. The original rests untouched beside it, and both remain yours.
One. Stacked changes unsettle exactly the parts you asked to keep, and the frame drifts away from itself.
Yes — your own photographs, under the same consent rules that govern every upload in the studio.
Narrow the instruction, and name what must stay identical. Vagueness is the usual cause of a drifting repair.
Drafts, edits, animation and finishing share one credit balance and one private library. Start with the piece you need today.
Open the generator